Tags |
|
|
Links |
|
|
Actual for You - How Culture Affects Sharing Information in an Organization
There are many technical sales recruitment agencies that help in the sector of providing jobs to the jobless and employees to employers. They are known to be very good and personalized in their services. These recruitment agencies are spread all over due to a very high demand of jobs. They have many base line jobs in different fields and their main motto is putting the right people in the right job. There are agencies that can be trusted. They get reviews for their services from various people including students who have been benefited by the services offered.There are students and people from different sectors of work who face a lot of failure when they approach companies and offices themselves, but there is great help from recruitment agencies who take responsibility in putting the individuals at the right place. The agencies take care of further guidance and counseling for getting jobs, they assist in giving their time sitting with the individual and helping them with the various jobs availability.They have a very good rapport with reputed industries, and HR departments. This rapport helps them to place individuals who walk into their office. Hence, there are varieties of options available with them for every one who needs their help. Along with it, there are other recruitment services that are provided like registration and selection; job offer management, interview management, paper checks and vacancy promotion. There is also more of in depth analysis that includes onsite services, candidate profiling, competency based interviewing, reference checks and skills testing.There are some disadvantages along with the advantages, there are some people who have certain expectations, and those expectations are not met because of qualification, experience, or other points of effect, which can be a hi
Employee Empowerment Level
Just as the leadership of the organization can have a task or relationship orientation, so can the rest of the organization. Are the employees empowered to make decisions in their day-to-day activities that affect positive business results? The trickling down of decision-making authority tends to strengthen the fiber of an organization. Granted, this also means trickling down the accountability for success as well. Well-trained, well-informed employees are essential to the successful empowered organization. High empowerme
Accountability is an interesting phenomenon. Everybody wants some, most folks think that they can handle it, yet very few people know how to deal with it continually.Much of the problems in business and life are intertwined with accountability or lack thereof. Ill-defined goals, unfocused people, inadequate communication, poorly thought out delegation, low self-esteem and sometimes just bad strategic management often lead to a break down of accountability.When an organizational chart is muddled, the result is usually a bunch of people running around with an unclear understanding of who’s accountable to whom. And sadly, even when the chart is bold and clear, it’s not uncommon for an accountability vacuum to occur.Why? Insufficient follow-through, passing off responsibility, only verbalizing goals, procedures and orders, and the lack of benchmarks, all lead to accountability problems.It’s extremely important to understand that accountability comes from the top. How can anyone truly be held accountable if they aren’t given the proper instructions? But it happens all the time. The person in charge assumes that they’ve made themselves perfectly clear, even when they have contradicted themselves or given half the needed information. The usual scenario, when things don’t turn out the way they need to for a successful and timely conclusion, is a boss who freaks out, sulks or looks for new people.Another reason is that most people are great at blaming someone else. “My department isn’t filling the orders on time because I can’t get inspection to regularly let me know how things are going” or “I’m done, it’s Jill I’m waiting on!” are all too common types of responses in corporate America, not to mention your house!And most people are also great at giving orders. “Well, I told him I ne
What Really Comprises an Organizational Culture?
Culture is a multidimensional enigma that envelops the organization. Every member of the organization contributes to the culture in some manner. The history, style of leadership, structural stability, level of work-force empowerment and the ability to adapt to a changing environment all contribute to the culture of an organization. Shaping the culture to face changes in the marketplace and environment depends in part on the ability for the organization's leadership to implement the guiding vision and mission. Every action taken must align with these vision and mission statements that express why the organization exists and how it will corporately conduct itself.
History and Background of Organization.
An organization’s history and background are the foundation that can be built upon or a barrier to overcome. Some of the attributes to consider are:
•The age of your organization. Many well-established companies are slow to change. If they have lasted for more than 50 years, then why do things differently? Conversely, newer organizations tend to sway in the winds of change and haven’t established roots deep enough to know how to react to new situations.
•The origins of your organization
Is your firm a conglomeration of many other smaller entities or a single-site manufacturing firm? There are considerations attached to either scenario. It is important that the history of your organization is known. When the pressure of a change situation is applied, old social norms can pop up. Understanding the origins assists in devising change management strategies.
Leadership Style
How the executives and senior management interact with the rest of the organization sets the tone of an organization’s culture. Granted, these leaders cannot single handedly change the culture. (Unless they fire everyone and start from scratch, not a likely scenario.) However, their leadership style dictates how they interact with their direct reports and the general employee population. These interactions send messages that have an impact on information sharing. Is the CEO sharing information? Does the average employee know the financial health of the company or the markets to be focused upon? Leadership style typically breaks down into two main categories:
•Command and Control – Task orientation tends to be the marquee of the command and control leadership style. Micromanaging the direct reports by telling them what to do, how to do it, when it should be done, by whom and where it should take place exemplifies high task-related behavior. There is only one-way communication with the exception of clarifying questions to make sure the objective is understood completely.
•Delegating/Empowering – Relationship orientation tends to be more facilitative and communicative. This leadership style depends on the synergy of the group to determine the best course of action. The behaviors exhibited included facilitation, listening, supporting and mentoring the other employees so that the best possible course of action can be created together. Employee buy-in is of great importance to this leadership style.
Structural Stability
The ability to withstand a change in organizational culture can be evident through some of the traditional business measures of stability. Financial strength, productivity and market focus are traditional business measures that define the stability of an organization’s structure. However, twenty-first century business models recognize some less tangible attributes of an organization’s structure that affect a change effort’s success.
Are there functional siloed reporting structures or does the business process dictate who works for whom? Do the channels of communication flow freely across functional areas? Can a manager from engineering communicate a problem to a manager in marketing without involving the senior managers from each area? It is important to have the strength of common understanding across the organization to exemplify its structural stability. If open communication threatens the ability to produce, the organization is not stable. This means being able to walk the walk and not just pay lip service to open communication and business process-related organizational structures.
Employee Empowerment Level
Just as the leadership of the organization can have a task or relationship orientation, so can the rest of the organization. Are the employees empowered to make decisions in their day-to-day activities that affect positive business results? The trickling down of decision-making authority tends to strengthen the fiber of an organization. Granted, this also means trickling down the accountability for success as well. Well-trained, well-informed employees are essential to the successful empowered organization. High empowermen
The environment is the number one change driver; either for your personal change “program” or for organizational moves. The environment brings the necessary conditions for change. There is a paradox behind this relation because the change and especially growth of the same businesses also cause changes to the environment. Companies need more “land” when they extent their operation, to name just one relation.The limitation of space is such an example that is quite obvious in the changing world. Not only the price of land constantly increases, but the simple availability of space is one of the biggest issues of our times. As a consequence, businesses and governmental operations are seeking way to change their operations. One solution is by using the “underground” space. Such a change where the scarcity of land is more and more becoming an issue is one of the simple changes that is affecting our lives. But less obvious are countless of other alterations that go so slowly that we hardly get acknowledge of the change and… this is the point, we are not really able to anticipate the change.An example of this influence of the environment is the climate change. We all talk about it, but one of the most important element to be able to do something is the impact of the change in current business. Is it true for example that the climate change is the cause of less snow in the Swiss Alps and mountains in Spain?A certain study (related to the snowfall) shows the gradual influences, but on an annual scale there no real notification. The mean snow depth, the duration of continuous snow cover and the number of snowfall days in the Swiss Alps all show very similar trends during the observation period 1931-99: a gradual increase until the early 1980s (with insignificant interruptions during the late 1950s and
History and Background of Organization.
An organization’s history and background are the foundation that can be built upon or a barrier to overcome. Some of the attributes to consider are:
•The age of your organization. Many well-established companies are slow to change. If they have lasted for more than 50 years, then why do things differently? Conversely, newer organizations tend to sway in the winds of change and haven’t established roots deep enough to know how to react to new situations.
•The origins of your organization
Is your firm a conglomeration of many other smaller entities or a single-site manufacturing firm? There are considerations attached to either scenario. It is important that the history of your organization is known. When the pressure of a change situation is applied, old social norms can pop up. Understanding the origins assists in devising change management strategies.
Leadership Style
How the executives and senior management interact with the rest of the organization sets the tone of an organization’s culture. Granted, these leaders cannot single handedly change the culture. (Unless they fire everyone and start from scratch, not a likely scenario.) However, their leadership style dictates how they interact with their direct reports and the general employee population. These interactions send messages that have an impact on information sharing. Is the CEO sharing information? Does the average employee know the financial health of the company or the markets to be focused upon? Leadership style typically breaks down into two main categories:
•Command and Control – Task orientation tends to be the marquee of the command and control leadership style. Micromanaging the direct reports by telling them what to do, how to do it, when it should be done, by whom and where it should take place exemplifies high task-related behavior. There is only one-way communication with the exception of clarifying questions to make sure the objective is understood completely.
•Delegating/Empowering – Relationship orientation tends to be more facilitative and communicative. This leadership style depends on the synergy of the group to determine the best course of action. The behaviors exhibited included facilitation, listening, supporting and mentoring the other employees so that the best possible course of action can be created together. Employee buy-in is of great importance to this leadership style.
Structural Stability
The ability to withstand a change in organizational culture can be evident through some of the traditional business measures of stability. Financial strength, productivity and market focus are traditional business measures that define the stability of an organization’s structure. However, twenty-first century business models recognize some less tangible attributes of an organization’s structure that affect a change effort’s success.
Are there functional siloed reporting structures or does the business process dictate who works for whom? Do the channels of communication flow freely across functional areas? Can a manager from engineering communicate a problem to a manager in marketing without involving the senior managers from each area? It is important to have the strength of common understanding across the organization to exemplify its structural stability. If open communication threatens the ability to produce, the organization is not stable. This means being able to walk the walk and not just pay lip service to open communication and business process-related organizational structures.
Employee Empowerment Level
Just as the leadership of the organization can have a task or relationship orientation, so can the rest of the organization. Are the employees empowered to make decisions in their day-to-day activities that affect positive business results? The trickling down of decision-making authority tends to strengthen the fiber of an organization. Granted, this also means trickling down the accountability for success as well. Well-trained, well-informed employees are essential to the successful empowered organization. High empowerme
"You are testing my patience."I had just shared an article with my husband on "Secret Dining", a hip new trend making its way from Chicago to New York. Essentially these underground "restaurants" offer gourmet dinners at invitation-only parties in exchange for "donations". Sometimes dinners are combined with salon-type discussions, art showings or other events. Cool, exclusive, hip. All the fun of running an upscale restaurant without all the health department hassles.I am a woman with a many interests. In one recent lunch conversation a friend and I managed to touch on a mind-boggling array of topics including martial arts, knitting and crocheting, gourmet cooking, Tarot cards, dream interpretation, massage/bodywork, marriage, writing, photography, tea ceremonies, pottery, journalling, and what she plans on doing when she becomes an empty nester a year from now. This was before I read the Secret Dining article, which now had me thinking about our monthly parties and the musicians I would love to have play for us and how a playwright friend may want to use our home as a set for a play. A little Midsummer Night's Dream in our woods, perhaps?My husband knows me very well and followed my river of unspoken thoughts to its logical conclusion while I casually ate my dinner and waited for him to finish reading. Once he reached the end, he calmly placed the paper on the table, looked me in the eye and said "No, you cannot open a restaurant in our home." All attempts to deny that I had been seriously entertaining the thought were met with patient silence and that knowing look that told me I was fooling no one.Then he asked the Question of Death: "When are you going to do what you are really supposed to be doing and write your book?""Whaaaa, but I don't know what the book is.""Yes yo
Leadership Style
How the executives and senior management interact with the rest of the organization sets the tone of an organization’s culture. Granted, these leaders cannot single handedly change the culture. (Unless they fire everyone and start from scratch, not a likely scenario.) However, their leadership style dictates how they interact with their direct reports and the general employee population. These interactions send messages that have an impact on information sharing. Is the CEO sharing information? Does the average employee know the financial health of the company or the markets to be focused upon? Leadership style typically breaks down into two main categories:
•Command and Control – Task orientation tends to be the marquee of the command and control leadership style. Micromanaging the direct reports by telling them what to do, how to do it, when it should be done, by whom and where it should take place exemplifies high task-related behavior. There is only one-way communication with the exception of clarifying questions to make sure the objective is understood completely.
•Delegating/Empowering – Relationship orientation tends to be more facilitative and communicative. This leadership style depends on the synergy of the group to determine the best course of action. The behaviors exhibited included facilitation, listening, supporting and mentoring the other employees so that the best possible course of action can be created together. Employee buy-in is of great importance to this leadership style.
Structural Stability
The ability to withstand a change in organizational culture can be evident through some of the traditional business measures of stability. Financial strength, productivity and market focus are traditional business measures that define the stability of an organization’s structure. However, twenty-first century business models recognize some less tangible attributes of an organization’s structure that affect a change effort’s success.
Are there functional siloed reporting structures or does the business process dictate who works for whom? Do the channels of communication flow freely across functional areas? Can a manager from engineering communicate a problem to a manager in marketing without involving the senior managers from each area? It is important to have the strength of common understanding across the organization to exemplify its structural stability. If open communication threatens the ability to produce, the organization is not stable. This means being able to walk the walk and not just pay lip service to open communication and business process-related organizational structures.
Employee Empowerment Level
Just as the leadership of the organization can have a task or relationship orientation, so can the rest of the organization. Are the employees empowered to make decisions in their day-to-day activities that affect positive business results? The trickling down of decision-making authority tends to strengthen the fiber of an organization. Granted, this also means trickling down the accountability for success as well. Well-trained, well-informed employees are essential to the successful empowered organization. High empowerme
The other day I brought my mother into an appliance store to purchase a television. By the time we left with her new television, she was completely disgusted. Unlike most of us, she comes from an older generation that actually expects salespeople and store employees to think of customers as valued visitors that represent their primary source of income. I wish that I could say that the store we visited was the exception, however, it was more the rule.From the time we entered the store, we noticed that the salespeople and employees were not attentive to the needs of customers. They acted as though they were being bothered or disturbed when we asked for help. None were able to provide any information about what was actually included with the televisions that interested us. When we did finally decided on a TV, no one seemed interested in helping us. Finally, a very annoyed employee found the TV we were looking for and all but tossed it in our cart. To make matters worse, another employee was extremely annoyed that we had asked for help in lifting the large item into my vehicle.After I brought the television to my mother’s residence, we found that it didn’t come with a coaxial cable or antenna. That was one of the questions the appliance store employees couldn’t or didn’t seem interested in answering. If the experience of being in that store hadn’t been so negative, I probably would have been focused enough on the product to remember to buy a coaxial cable just in case it didn’t come with one. I also forgot about several other smaller electronic items I had planned to purchase. My local Radio Shack benefited from the rudeness of those appliance store employees. They got the sale of the coaxial cable and a bunch of other things I needed. In retrospect, I probably should have just went there to begin with.ask-related behavior. There is only one-way communication with the exception of clarifying questions to make sure the objective is understood completely.
•Delegating/Empowering – Relationship orientation tends to be more facilitative and communicative. This leadership style depends on the synergy of the group to determine the best course of action. The behaviors exhibited included facilitation, listening, supporting and mentoring the other employees so that the best possible course of action can be created together. Employee buy-in is of great importance to this leadership style.
Structural Stability
The ability to withstand a change in organizational culture can be evident through some of the traditional business measures of stability. Financial strength, productivity and market focus are traditional business measures that define the stability of an organization’s structure. However, twenty-first century business models recognize some less tangible attributes of an organization’s structure that affect a change effort’s success.
Are there functional siloed reporting structures or does the business process dictate who works for whom? Do the channels of communication flow freely across functional areas? Can a manager from engineering communicate a problem to a manager in marketing without involving the senior managers from each area? It is important to have the strength of common understanding across the organization to exemplify its structural stability. If open communication threatens the ability to produce, the organization is not stable. This means being able to walk the walk and not just pay lip service to open communication and business process-related organizational structures.
Employee Empowerment Level
Just as the leadership of the organization can have a task or relationship orientation, so can the rest of the organization. Are the employees empowered to make decisions in their day-to-day activities that affect positive business results? The trickling down of decision-making authority tends to strengthen the fiber of an organization. Granted, this also means trickling down the accountability for success as well. Well-trained, well-informed employees are essential to the successful empowered organization. High empowerme
It is not new news that majority of people in and around America and rest of world has major issues managing their finances. Do you know: there are number of good and valuable tools that can be used to not only to manage your budget but also helps you to stick to them? Another fact that will open your eyes is about the highest credit card debt ever reported in America has touched $8500. With lots of surveys being conducted around America, figures have revealed that most people spend more than 10% of what they earn. Reason for this is the inability of an average person to manage their budget.Do you know how important budgeting is in your life? Consider these valuable benefits: budgeting allows you to secure your finance in a proper manner securing your current and future and gives you peace of mind, not having to worry about “how to repay the money”. With the inclusion of the forecasting features, the budgeting software can show you an estimate of your finances in future. If your future is important to you then you should get used to budgeting before the time passes quickly and leaving you under debt.Almost all good budgeting software’s are available on the internet which can be purchased and downloaded instantly. However, if you don’t want to spend your money into any such budgeting software’s then search the internet for those which are available FREE of cost. Remember, budgeting software’s are not the ones like excel spreadsheets that you might be using on daily basis. Almost all the major budgeting software’s have a forecasting feature which revels the figures for any “What happens if” type questions. You can create various types/styles of reports and can analyze different situations and scenarios. Using such powerful tools can give great power in the hands of the CPAs as they could understand and
Employee Empowerment Level
Just as the leadership of the organization can have a task or relationship orientation, so can the rest of the organization. Are the employees empowered to make decisions in their day-to-day activities that affect positive business results? The trickling down of decision-making authority tends to strengthen the fiber of an organization. Granted, this also means trickling down the accountability for success as well. Well-trained, well-informed employees are essential to the successful empowered organization. High empowerment and high autonomy need to have well-defined guiding objectives.
Adaptability or Agility
The only constant in today’s business environment is change. Successful organizations seem to adapt to a change in market conditions seamlessly and with minimal effort. How are they able to be so agile, so nimble? The culture is ready for the unexpected. In fact, they expect the unexpected! Unknowns are part of their day-to-day planning and routines.
Vision and Mission Statement Implementation
An organization’s vision and mission should be articulated and available for the entire organization to witness and internalize. A vision gets everyone on the same page and shows where the organization’s future lies. A vision must be shared or an opportunity to buck the system and cause strife presents itself. Work to cultivate a shared vision. The mission statement tells the organization, suppliers and customers who your company is and what its value proposition is to them.
The statement, "Why, because this is who we are," provides the context in which employees know how to operate and conduct business. The vision and mission are two very important and foundational pieces of guiding information that must be clearly communicated to the entire organization and monitored for adherence to the principles of your organization’s beliefs and ethics. If you cannot share them, then sharing other critical business items is highly doubtful.
Assessing the Cultural Impact on Information Sharing
As previously stated, the ability of your organization to share knowledge and information is predicated on the cultural temperament of your organization and its pace of change. Every organization adapts to change. It's the speed and flexibility to which this adaptation takes place that determine success. Assessing the culture and understanding how to approach knowledge sharing within the organizational structure supports change efforts.
Assessing the organization from a cultural perspective assists in designing change management plans that address the human factors. Acceptance of new information sharing processes and technology by the people who have to enact the processes or utilize the technology is critical to successful implementation. Therefore, understanding the culture from an objective compilation of subjective information gathering begins to map out the barriers to information sharing that can occur. It also exposes the leverage points resident in the organization that can positively impact information sharing as well.
Outcomes of the Cultural Impact
Assessing the corporate culture will propel information-sharing efforts. How? By understanding the context in which knowledge will be perceived and applied. Depending on how favorable and conducive the culture of your organization is to sharing information, the extremes of the knowledge-sharing culture are either to share for the sake of sharing versus hoarding knowledge and information to protect one's position. Information Sharing vs. Information Hoarding.
One would think that information sharing is always better than hoarding information. However, sharing information just for the sake of sharing must have a business purpose at its root. For example, a CEO who decides to publish the minutes of his senior staff meetings on the company intranet to prove that the organization's culture is open will appear to be sharing for the sake of sharing without a sound business reason. Sharing information should support business decision making or propel innovation. There must also be a structured process by which to capture and use the information being uncovered. Capturing the engineers' problem-solving conversation by the water cooler so that others in the company can benefit from their expertise is the benefit information-sharing activities should return. The corporate culture that supports information sharing is ahead of the one that does not. However, gaining business benefit from the activity requires a structured approach to leverage uncovered information.
Information hoarding is the other extreme. Information and knowledge still represent power. This is truer in today's economy than ever before. Organizations are learning that employee interactions yield new knowledge and information that can benefit their business in tangible ways. Hoarding is not always a conscience act of holding back information. Interestingly, it's not always the highly paid senior manager that possesses the knowledge to meet the challenge of the day's pressing issues
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
<a href="http://www.actual4u.com/article/23755/actual4u-How-Culture-Affects-Sharing-Information-in-an-Organization.html">How Culture Affects Sharing Information in an Organization</a>
BB link (for phorums):
[url=http://www.actual4u.com/article/23755/actual4u-How-Culture-Affects-Sharing-Information-in-an-Organization.html]How Culture Affects Sharing Information in an Organization[/url]
Related Articles:
Chiropractic Office Billing and Patient Relationship Management Software
What Makes Corporate Gifts An Investment?
Bookmark it:
|