e soundly defined? In principle, does the Commonwealth of Virginia have the right to define what marriage means to all citizens? Should the Commonwealth of Virginia be limited in theWhat then permits the same civilian judge to marry Virginia citizens of a religious society and deny citizens a civil union? Then, how does protecting marriage through the Marriage Proposal for specific persons (permitting only a male and female to marry) find acceptance while denying other equally protected citizens protection through civil unions? Should marriage afford greater protection? Are citizen rights once defined, always defined and equally assured? If not, then how many ways must we define citizen rights and redefine their protection? Should we permit the discrimination of their protection? What may be Virginia’s basis for discrimination of certain citizens when U.S. Constitutional protections of all citizens are soundly defined? In principle, does the Commonwealth of Virginia have the right to define what marriage means to all citizens? Should the Commonwealth of Virginia be limited in theioposal for specific persons (permitting only a male and female to marry) find acceptance while denying other equally protected citizens protection through civil unions? Should marriage afford greater protection? Are citizen rights once defined, always defined and equally assured? If not, then how many ways must we define citizen rights and redefine their protection? Should we permit the discrimination of their protection? What may be Virginia’s basis for discrimination of certain citizens when U.S. Constitutional protections of all citizens are soundly defined? In principle, does the Commonwealth of Virginia have the right to define what marriage means to all citizens? Should the Commonwealth of Virginia be limited in the afford greater protection? Are citizen rights once defined, always defined and equally assured? If not, then how many ways must we define citizen rights and redefine their protection? Should we permit the discrimination of their protection? What may be Virginia’s basis for discrimination of certain citizens when U.S. Constitutional protections of all citizens are soundly defined? In principle, does the Commonwealth of Virginia have the right to define what marriage means to all citizens? Should the Commonwealth of Virginia be limited in then? Should we permit the discrimination of their protection? What may be Virginia’s basis for discrimination of certain citizens when U.S. Constitutional protections of all citizens are soundly defined? In principle, does the Commonwealth of Virginia have the right to define what marriage means to all citizens? Should the Commonwealth of Virginia be limited in thee soundly defined? In principle, does the Commonwealth of Virginia have the right to define what marriage means to all citizens? Should the Commonwealth of Virginia be limited in their definition and if so how? Is marriage solely religious and union solely civil? Why can we not have room for them both to assure rights to all our citizens?

Can we accept Senator Bill Frist (R-TN)’s position as reasonable? Senator First stated, "I believe that others have the right to live as they choose, free from discrimination. But I don't believe that this acceptance, that this tolerance should lead to a radical redefinition of marriage." If we accept the simple premise of a citizen’s right to live as they choose free from discrimination, maybe we should limit the act of marriage for only religious ceremonies. Separating religion from government is an accepted principle. Leaving marriage to be a religious act,