Tags |
|
|
Links |
|
|
Actual for You - Should You Be More Explicit When Managing Change?
You might be new in this company and what is being practiced in your previous company might not be applicable to the present company. It has been a practice to present corporate gifts to almost everyone that has to do with the company; here are some that you should
Obviously there are other ways. Therefore,
No (is also possible).
Think about
Elaborate custom-built booths, sleek pop-ups, and adaptable modular displays get all the glory. And it’s true; the right booth is a crucial part of any successful trade show exhibit. But it just couldn’t be done without the unsung hero of the trade show: the bann
If you want to prevent comments like: “what the heck is going on here?” you might consider to be more explicit when dealing with change. This is especially relevant if you are guiding a change program. Think about a change project and there is no explicit message about a new direction or focus. Even if you are not able to explain what will happen after the change, you should communicate what will change in relation to the current situation. It is impossible to predict future changes and often change initiatives will take an unprecedented turn. Yet for larger projects and change initiatives that are driven from a central point require an explicit approach. Main keyword for this approach are large projects and central program management.
Obviously there are other ways. Therefore,
No (is also possible).
Think about
A South African publication revealed that South Africa's top 100 advertisers spent in excess of $930 million on building their brands in 2005. Some individual companies spent upwards of $28 million on advertising to drive their brands home.What's being adver
Obviously there are other ways. Therefore,
No (is also possible).
Think about
Two of the many interview questions that crop up regularly have been going around in my head just recently. These are the ones that could be just like walking into a man-trap if you are not really careful. They sound almost innocuous and really quite so straigh
Obviously there are other ways. Therefore,
No (is also possible).
Think about
When it comes to creating and building a brand name, most companies feel compelled to file trademarks and establish “guidelines” to protect their image. Yet some of the most well known brands in the world today are holidays – wide open to use and abuse in the publi
Obviously there are other ways. Therefore,
No (is also possible).
Think about
You may have read one of my previous articles on career transitioning which described how to create complementary careers for yourself. This article will introduce you to three people I call Fearless Flyers because they have taken the leap of faith that many of us
Obviously there are other ways. Therefore,
No (is also possible).
Think about how we learn a language and the main mechanism behind the language: http://ezinearticles.com/?Grammar-Teaching:-Implicit-or-Explicit?&id=89342
“Grammar teaching should be implicit,” is the conclusion of the article. And one of the reasons mentioned is that learning would otherwise be more boring.
And that could be a similar argument against explicit change programs. For small initiatives it is true; "don't tell us what to do, that is boring!" Let the best change initiatives compete against each other (in larger organizations) and evaluate which one will work best. This freedom is possible in decentralized and autonomous units with an own focus. But it could als
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
<a href="http://www.actual4u.com/article/13907/actual4u-Should-You-Be-More-Explicit-When-Managing-Change.html">Should You Be More Explicit When Managing Change?</a>
BB link (for phorums):
[url=http://www.actual4u.com/article/13907/actual4u-Should-You-Be-More-Explicit-When-Managing-Change.html]Should You Be More Explicit When Managing Change?[/url]
Related Articles:
Words of Value, Words of Truth
Bookmark it:
|